![](https://jobfairglobal.org/wp-content/plugins/wp-jobsearch/images/no-image.jpg)
Evolution Korea
Add a review FollowOverview
-
Founded Date February 27, 1983
-
Sectors Engineering
-
Posted Jobs 0
-
Viewed 15
Company Description
10 Things That Your Family Taught You About Evolution Korea
The economic crisis that swept across Asia caused a major review of the traditional system of government, business alliances, and public management of risk. In Korea this required a change in the development paradigm.
In a controversial move South Korea’s government has requested textbook publishers to ignore calls to remove examples of evolution from high school science books. These include the evidence for evolution of horses as well as the Avian an ancestor Archaeopteryx.
1. Evolution and Religion
A creationist group from South Korea has successfully convinced textbook publishers to remove evidence of evolution in high school science textbooks. The Society for Textbook Revise, an independent offshoot from the Korea Association for Creation Research which aims to rid biology textbooks of “atheist materialism,” was behind the decision. The STR claims that this kind of materialistic thinking creates a negative picture for students and can lead to their eventual loss of faith.
Scientists from all over the world expressed concern when the STR campaign gained attention. Jae Choe, an evolutionary biologist at Ewha Womans University, Seoul, complained in a letter to Nature’s editor that South Korea had succumbed to religious prejudice. He was backed by colleagues across the country, who set up an organization called Evolution Korea to organize a petition against the textbook changes.
Some researchers are also worried that the STR campaign will spread to other parts of the world where the belief in creationism is on the rise. The letter to Nature warned of the anti-evolution movement putting more pressure on textbook revisions, particularly in countries with large Christian and Muslim populations.
The South Korean culture is particularly strong for the evolution debate. 26 percent of South Koreans belong to of a religious community with the majority of them practicing Christianity or Buddhism. In addition, a lot of Koreans adhere to the Ch’ondogyo philosophy, which is based on Confucian principles that emphasizes harmony among people and individual self-cultivation. Ch’ondogyo is a belief system that teaches that humans are one with Hanulnim the God of the Sun, and that heaven-bound blessings can be derived through good works.
All of this has created a fertile field. Several studies have shown that students who have a religious background are more hesitant about learning evolution than those who do not have a religious background. The reasons behind this aren’t clear. Students who have a religious background may not be as familiar with the theories of science, making them more susceptible to creationists’ influence. Another reason could be that students with a religious background may view evolution as a belief system that is atheistic, making them feel uncomfortable.
2. Evolution and Science
In recent years, anti-evolution campaigns in schools have caused concern within the scientific community. A study conducted in 2009 found that more than 40 percent of Americans believe that biological evolution is a lie and that believing in it would be contrary to their faith-based beliefs. Many scientists believe that, despite the popularity of creationism the best method to counter this belief is to educate the public on the evidence that supports evolution.
Scientists are accountable to teach their students science that includes the theory of evolution. They must also inform the public about the process of scientific research and how knowledge is confirmed. They should also explain how scientific theories are frequently challenged and modified. However, misunderstandings regarding the nature of research conducted by scientists often create anti-evolution beliefs.
Some people confuse the word “theory” as a hunch, or a guess. In science, however the theory is thoroughly tested and verified using empirical evidence. A theory that is repeatedly tested and observed becomes a scientific principle.
The debate over evolution theory is a great occasion to discuss both the importance of the scientific method and its limits. It is crucial for people to recognize that science is not able to answer questions regarding the purpose or meaning of life but it is merely a means through which living organisms can grow and change.
A well-rounded education should also include exposure to the major fields of science including evolutionary biology. This is crucial because the jobs people are employed in and the decisions they make require understanding of how science works.
The vast majority of scientists around the world accept that humans have evolved over time. A recent study that predicted adults’ view of the consensus on this subject found that those who had higher levels of education and scientific knowledge were more likely to believe that there is a consensus among scientists on the subject of human evolution. People with more religious beliefs and less science-based knowledge are more likely to disagree. It is essential that educators insist on understanding the general consensus on this issue to ensure that individuals have a solid basis for making informed decisions regarding their health care, energy usage, and other policy issues.
3. Evolution and Culture
Cultural evolution is a close relative of the popular evolutionary theory. It explores how organisms like humans learn from one another. Researchers in this field use explanatory tools and investigative models derived from evolutionary theorists. They also go back to prehistoric times to find the origins of culture.
This approach also acknowledges that there are some differences between cultural and biological traits. Cultural traits can be acquired slowly, whereas biological traits are usually acquired at the same time (in sexual species, at fertilization). The acquisition of one characteristic can influence the growth and development of another.
In Korea the introduction of Western styles in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries was the result a complex sequence of events. One of the most important was the arrival in Korea of Japanese occupation forces who introduced Western hairstyles and clothing.
When Japan quit Korea in the 1930s, a few of these changes began to reverse. By the end of World War II, Korea had once again unified but this time under the rule of the Choson dynasty.
Today, Korea is a vibrant political and economic power. Despite the current global financial crisis, the country’s economy has grown steadily in the last decade and is expected to sustain its steady growth in the coming years.
The current government has many challenges to face. One of the most significant is the inability to come up with a consistent policy to address the economic crisis. The crisis has exposed shortcomings of the country’s economic policies, particularly its dependence on exports and foreign investment, which may not be sustainable over the long term.
As the crisis has shattered the confidence of investors, the government must review its economic strategy and find alternatives to increase domestic demand. To ensure a stable and stable financial environment the government needs reform its incentive system, monitoring and discipline. This chapter offers a variety of scenarios on how the Korean economy might grow in a post-crisis environment.
4. Evolution and Education
The biggest challenge for evolution educators is how to present evolutionary concepts in ways that are appropriate for students of various levels of development and ages. Teachers should, for instance be aware of the diversity of religions in their classrooms and create a learning environment where students of both religious and secular perspectives are comfortable. Teachers must also understand common misconceptions about evolution, and how to confront these in their classrooms. Teachers should also have quick access to the numerous resources available to teach evolution.
In this context the Thinking Evolutionarily Convocation was a crucial step in bringing together evolutionary scientists and educators from a range of sectors to discuss the best methods for teaching evolution. The participants included representatives from scientific societies and educational researchers, as well as officials of government funding agencies, and curriculum developers. The convergence of these diverse stakeholders led to the identification of a common set of recommendations that will form the foundation for future actions.
It is crucial to include evolution in all science curricula at every level. National Science Education Standards (NRC), which call for the integration of evolution across all life sciences with a progression that is developmentally appropriate, are a good way to accomplish this goal. A new publication from the NRC provides guidance for schools on how to integrate evolution into the life science curriculum.
Multiple studies have shown that a more complete presentation of evolution leads to better understanding by students and belief in evolution. It is difficult to determine the causality of teaching in the classroom, since school curricula do not change in a random manner and are dependent on the timing of state board of education and gubernatorial election. To overcome this problem, I use a longitudinal data set which lets me control for state and year fixed effects as well as individual-level variations in teacher beliefs regarding evolution.
Another important result is that teachers who feel more comfortable teaching about evolution report having fewer personal barriers to doing so. This is consistent with the hypothesis that a more experienced faculty is less likely to avoid tackling evolution topics in the classroom and may be more likely to employ strategies, such as an approach to reconciliation that is known to increase undergraduate student acceptance of evolution (Harms and Reiss 2019; Tolman et al., 2020).